Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.; Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L. | |
Department | 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 ; 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 |
Jin H(金辉)1; Yang XY(杨晓燕)1; Yan ZQ(燕志强)1; Liu Q(刘权)1; Li XZ(李秀壮)1; Chen JX(陈吉祥)2; Zhang DH(张等宏)3; Ceng LM(曾黎明)1; Qin B(秦波)1,4; Qin B(秦波) | |
2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 ; 2014 | |
Source Publication | Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology ; Systematic and Applied Microbiology |
ISSN | 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 ; 0723-2020 |
Volume | 37Issue:5Pages:376-385 |
Abstract | A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. ;A diverse array of bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere and different plant organs play a crucial role in plant health and growth. Therefore, a general understanding of these bacterial communities and their diversity is necessary. Using the 16S rRNA gene clone library technique, the bacterial community structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria in Stellera chamaejasme compartments were compared and clarified for the first time. Grouping of the sequences obtained showed that members of the Proteobacteria (43.2%), Firmicutes (36.5%) and Actinobacteria (14.1%) were dominant in both samples. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Bacteroidetes (2.1%), Chloroflexi (1.9%), and Cyanobacteria (1.7%). The habitats (rhizosphere vs endophytes) and organs (leaf, stem and root) structured the community, since the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicated that more varied bacteria inhabited the rhizosphere compared to the organs of the plant. In addition, correspondence analysis also showed that differences were apparent in the bacterial communities associated with these distinct habitats. Moreover, principal component analysis revealed that the profiles obtained from the rhizosphere and roots were similar, whereas leaf and stem samples clustered together on the opposite side of the plot from the rhizosphere and roots. Taken together, these results suggested that, although the communities associated with the rhizosphere and organs shared some bacterial species, the associated communities differed in structure and diversity. |
Keyword | Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Plant-associated Bacteria Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure Bacterial Community Structure SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. SteL.era Chamaejasme L. 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene 16s Rrna Gene Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity Biodiversity |
Subject Area | 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 ; 植物化学生态研究 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 ; 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001 |
Funding Organization | National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 310703863);the Basic Research Program of the Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (080423SYR1);the associate scholar “Western Light” talents cultivation program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2010) |
Indexed By | SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI ; SCI |
If | 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 ; 3.283 |
Language | 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 ; 英语 |
Funding Project | 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 ; 植物化学生态研究组 |
compositor | 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 ; 第一作者单位 |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | 期刊论文 |
Identifier | http://ir.licp.cn/handle/362003/6942 |
Collection | 中科院西北特色植物资源化学重点实验室/甘肃省天然药物重点实验室 |
Corresponding Author | Qin B(秦波) |
Affiliation | 1.Key Laboratory of Chemistry of Northwestern Plant Resources and Key Laboratory for Natural Medicine of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China 2.School of Petrochemical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China 3.Sino-U.S. Centers for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem Education Ministry, College of Prataculture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China 4.State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China 5.Lanzhou Univ, State Key Lab Appl Organ Chem, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Jin H,Yang XY,Yan ZQ,et al. Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L., Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology, Systematic and Applied Microbiology,2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014, 2014,37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37, 37(5):376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385, 376-385. |
APA | Jin H.,Yang XY.,Yan ZQ.,Liu Q.,Li XZ.,...&秦波.(2014).Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L..Systematic and Applied Microbiology,37(5),376-385. |
MLA | Jin H,et al."Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.".Systematic and Applied Microbiology 37.5(2014):376-385. |
Files in This Item: | ||||||
File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
Systematic and Appli(2871KB) | 期刊论文 | 作者接受稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | View Application Full Text |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment